Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǰñ °ñÀý¿¡ °üÇÑ 10³â°£ÀÇ ÃßÀûÁ¶»ç ¿¬±¸

10 YEAR RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON MANDIBLE FRACTURES

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 25±Ç 1È£ p.32 ~ 37
ÃÖÇöÁØ, À±Á¤Çö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÇöÁØ (  ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³
À±Á¤Çö (  ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

°á·Ð
ÀúÀÚ´Â 1987³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1996³â 12¿ù±îÁöÀÇ 10³â°£ Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ºÎ¼Ó ¿ë»êº´¿ø¿¡ ³»¿øÇÏ¿©
ÇϾǰñ °ñÀý·Î Áø´ÜµÈ ȯÀÚ Áß Ä¡°ú¿¡¼­ ÀÔ¿øÄ¡·á¸¦ ¹Þ°í Àǹ«±â·ÏÀÌ Ãæ½ÇÇÏ¿© ÃßÀûÁ¶»ç°¡
°¡´ÉÇÑ 245Áõ·Ê¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀÓ»óÀû ¿¬±¸¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ¿¬µµº°·Î´Â 1990³â±îÁö´Â Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Ù°¡ ÀÌÈķδ °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â Ãß¼¼¸¦ º¸¿´°í ³²³à ºñ´Â 6 :
1·Î ³²ÀÚ¿¡ È£¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. ¿øÀκ°·Î´Â ±³Åë»ç°í(30.2%), ±¸Å¸ ¹× Æø·Â(28.6%), Ã߶ô ¹× ½ÇÁ·(25.3%), »êÀç(7.0%),
½ºÆ÷Ã÷(6.9%)ÀÇ ¼øÀ¸·Î È£¹ßÇÏ¿´À¸³ª ÃÖ±Ù µé¾î ±³Åë»ç°í·Î ÀÎÇÑ °ñÀýÀÇ °¨¼Ò ¹× ½ºÆ÷Ã÷·Î
ÀÎÇÑ °ñÀýÀÇ Áõ°¡°¡ Ư¡ÀûÀ̾ú´Ù.
5. ¿¬·Éº°·Î´Â 20´ë(44.9%), 10´ë(26.9%), 30´ë(13.9%)ÀÇ ¼øÀ̾ú°í, 10´ë ÀÌÇÏ´Â ±³Åë»ç°í,
Ã߶ô ¹× ½ÇÁ·¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ñÀý¸¸ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³µ°í ½ºÆ÷Ã÷¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ñÀýÀº 10´ë, 20´ë¿¡ ÁýÁߵǾî ÀÖ¾ú
´Ù.
4. ºÎÀ§º°·Î´Â Á¤ÁߺÎ(36)%), ÁÂÃø¿ì°¢ºÎ(16.4%), ¿ìÃø°úµÎºÎ(10.4%), ¿ìÃø¿ì°¢ºÎ(8.6%),
ÁÂÃø°úµÎºÎ(8.6%), ÁÂÃø°ñüºÎ(5.8%), ¿ìÃø°ñüºÎ(5.6%), ÁÂÃø»óÇàÁö(4.0%), ¿ìÃø»óÇàÁö
(3.8%)ÀÇ ¼ø¼­¿´°í Æò±Õ 1.62ºÎÀ§¿¡¼­ °ñÀýÀÌ ÀϾ°í 191°³ÀÇ °ñÀý¼±À» º¸¿´´Ù.
5. ´Ü¼ø°ñÀýÀÌ 43.7%, º¹Àâ°ñÀýÀÌ 56.3%ÀÌ¿´°í, °³¹æ¼º °ñÀýÀÌ 35.5%, ºñ°³¹æ¼º °ñÀýÀÌ
64.5%¿´´Ù.
6 ÀüüÀûÀÎ °ñÀýóġ´Â ºñ°üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹¼úÀÌ 25.7% °üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹¼úÀÌ 74.3%ÀÌ¿´°í, ÇϾǰú
µÎºÎÀ§´Â ºñ°üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹¼úÀÌ 68.0%, °üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹¼úÀÌ 32.0%ÀÌ¿´´Ù.
7 ¼ö»ó ÈÄ °üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹¼úÀÇ ½ÃÇà±îÁö´Â Æò±Õ 3.27ÀÏÀÌ ¼Ò¿äµÇ¾ú°í, Æò±ÕÀç¿ø±â°£Àº 10.07
ÀÏ À̾ú´Ù.
8, ÇϾǿ찢ºÎ°ñÀýÀÇ 60.6%¿¡¼­ Á¦3´ë±¸Ä¡°¡ Á¸ÀçÇÏ¿´´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
This report was a 10year retrospective study on mandible fractures.
The study was based on a series of 245 patients who had been treated for mandibular
fractures as in-patient at Yongsan Hospital of Medical college of Chung-Ang University
during the period of Jan. 1987 to Dec. 1996.
The results obtained are as follows;
1. In respect of incidence, the number of fractures was increased to 1990 and then it
was decreased. The ratio of Men to Women was 6 : 1.
2. The major etiologic factors were traffic accident(30.2%), fisticuffs(28.6%),
falldown(25.3%), accident related to work(7.8%), and sports(6.9%). In recent years, the
decreasement of fractures due to traffic accident and the increasement of fractures due
to sports was impressive.
3. The age frequency was highst in the third decade(44.9%), and second(%),
fourth(%), decade in orders. In the first decade, the cause of fractures was traffic
accident and falldown only, and ¼Û fractures due to sports were concentrated on second
and third decade.
4. The frequent location of mandibular fractures was symphysis(36.1%), left
angle(16.4%), right condyle(10.4%), right angle(8.6%), left condyle(8.6%), left body(5.8%),
left ramus(4.0%), ramus(3.8%). The number of average fracture site was 1.62 at each
patient and the number of average fracture line was 1.91 at each patient.
5. The simple fracture was 43.7%, and the complex fracture was 56.3%, then the open
fracture was 35.5%, and the closed fracture was 64.5%.
6. In respect of treatment, the frequency of open reduction was 74.3% and that of
closed reduction was 25.7%, but in the condyle, closed reduction(68.0%) was the more
frequently using method of treatment than open reduction(32.0%).
7. The patients were treated an average of 3.27 days after injury and the average
hospitalization period was 10.07 days.
8. The mandibular 3rd molar was existing in 60.6% of angle fractures.

Å°¿öµå

mandible; fracture;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed